Shark Tank India Season 4: Vijay Nihalchandani’s Pitch for ‘Make My Payment’ Sparks Heated Debate Among Sharks
Vijay Nihalchandani’s Make My Payment pitch on Shark Tank India Season 4 sparked debates among sharks, highlighting the challenges of influencer-led startups.
The latest episode of Shark Tank India Season 4 became one of the most contentious of the season, with influencer-turned-entrepreneur Vijay Nihalchandani pitching his app Make My Payment. This app, designed to send automated reminders to defaulting debtors, was met with sharp critiques and divided opinions from the panel of sharks. Vijay’s pitch, backed by his wife, brother, and business partner, requested ₹30 lakh in exchange for a 3% equity stake in the company. However, the presentation took an unexpected turn, leading to heated exchanges among the sharks.
The Pitch That Divided Opinions
Vijay Nihalchandani, known as a finance and business influencer with over one million Instagram followers, introduced Make My Payment as a solution for recovering debts through automated reminders. While the concept intrigued some, the execution and scale raised serious doubts.
Namita Thapar, Executive Director of Emcure Pharmaceuticals, pointed out a critical flaw in the business model. She noted that defaulting debtors could easily block the automated calls, rendering the app ineffective. Vijay’s wife countered by highlighting the app’s feature of using different numbers for calls, but this failed to convince the sharks.
Lenskart CEO Peyush Bansal asked about Vijay’s earnings as an influencer, and Vijay revealed an income of ₹5 lakh per month through Instagram. While Peyush appreciated this, Shaadi.com founder Anupam Mittal dismissed the app as unsustainable. “This is not a business. Get serious,” he remarked, further questioning the founders on their customer base. When Vijay’s wife revealed that only 200 of their 3,500 users were paying subscribers, Anupam said, “You’re making ₹30,000 per month; isse acha thela laga lo (you’d be better off running a food cart).”
A Heated Exchange Among the Sharks
Vijay Nihalchandani’s After the founders exited without securing any investment, a heated debate erupted among the sharks. Anupam criticized Peyush for “cheerleading” an influencer rather than evaluating the business critically. Namita echoed his sentiments, emphasizing that Shark Tank is about fostering serious entrepreneurship. Peyush defended his stance, arguing that Vijay’s ability to amass one million followers was commendable. However, Anupam countered, “If it’s so impressive, then why didn’t you invest?”
Influencers in the Hot Seat
This is not the first time an influencer-turned-entrepreneur has faced sharp criticism on the show. Earlier in the season, Gaurav Taneja, better known as Flying Beast, pitched his fitness brand Beast Life. Seeking ₹1 crore for 1% equity, Taneja highlighted impressive sales figures but faced skepticism over the brand’s dependence on his personal popularity. Anupam delivered a now-viral critique, saying, “You’re a good influencer but a terrible entrepreneur.” The comment sparked a wave of discussion online, with Taneja later updating his LinkedIn bio to read, “Good Influencer/Terrible Entrepreneur.”
Challenges of Influencer-Led Startups
The debates on Shark Tank India highlight the challenges influencers face when transitioning to entrepreneurship. While a strong personal brand can drive initial traction, building a scalable and sustainable business requires a solid foundation and full-time dedication.
Namita Thapar summed it up, saying, “My role here is not just to invest but also to educate founders. This business isn’t solving a meaningful problem at scale.”
What Lies Ahead for Make My Payment?
Though Vijay Nihalchandani left the show without a deal, his pitch and the subsequent debates have sparked conversations about the intersection of social media influence and business viability. Whether Make My Payment evolves into a sustainable venture or remains a cautionary tale for influencers eyeing the entrepreneurial route, only time will tell.
Key Takeaways from the Episode
- Scalability Over Hype: A strong personal brand may generate buzz, but long-term success depends on solving real-world problems effectively.
- Focus and Dedication: As Anupam Mittal noted, entrepreneurship demands undivided attention and effort—being a part-time entrepreneur often doesn’t work.
- Critical Evaluation: The sharks’ sharp critique serves as a reminder that business ideas need more than initial traction; they require validation and a clear growth path.
Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs)
Q1: What is Make My Payment?
Make My Payment is a mobile application that sends automated reminders to defaulting debtors, aiming to help users recover unpaid debts. The app uses different numbers to ensure messages reach the intended recipients.
Q2: Why did the sharks reject the pitch?
The sharks raised concerns about the business model’s scalability and sustainability. Namita Thapar pointed out that defaulting debtors could easily block the app’s calls. Additionally, the limited number of paying subscribers—only 200 out of 3,500 users—highlighted a lack of significant traction.
Q3: Who is Vijay Nihalchandani?
Vijay Nihalchandani is a business and finance influencer with over 1 million Instagram followers. Besides his social media presence, he runs a hotel booking business and pitched Make My Payment on Shark Tank India.
Q4: Did the sharks invest in Make My Payment?
No, the founders left the show without securing any investment. The sharks, particularly Anupam Mittal, criticized the business for its lack of scale and profitability.
Q5: How did the sharks react to Vijay’s pitch?
The sharks had divided opinions. Peyush Bansal appreciated Vijay’s ability to gather a large social media following, but Anupam Mittal and Namita Thapar dismissed the business as unviable. Anupam even remarked, “This is not a business. Get serious.”
Q6: Have other influencers faced similar criticism on Shark Tank India?
Yes, earlier in the season, YouTuber Gaurav Taneja (Flying Beast) pitched his fitness brand Beast Life. Despite impressive sales figures, the sharks questioned its sustainability and criticized Taneja for not fully dedicating himself to the business.
Q7: What can aspiring entrepreneurs learn from this episode?
This episode underscores the importance of focusing on scalable, meaningful solutions rather than relying solely on personal brand popularity. Founders should also prepare to answer critical questions about their business model and financials.
Hashtags: #SharkTankIndia #MakeMyPayment #Entrepreneurship #Influencers